.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

lance gross

lance gross. Pigford amp; Lance Gross at
  • Pigford amp; Lance Gross at



  • Half Glass
    Sep 9, 02:55 PM
    Benchmarks look good...real good for a laptop chip! I wonder how the laptops will fare!

    Loving the MacPro, and just like you guys waiting for some of the software to be seriously optimized for more than 2 cores. I've seen ~289% in spurts but not more from an app while encoding some video (I think the 289% was Handbrake). FCP seems to keep itself under 2 cores.

    Bring on the truly optimized software and lets roll!

    --Half Glass





    lance gross. Lance Gross Shows A DC
  • Lance Gross Shows A DC



  • Eraserhead
    Apr 11, 12:25 PM
    Why not to imperial?

    Because its **** as it doesn't have straightforward unit conversions and because everyone else in the world other than the US (and for a small number of things the UK) uses metric.

    I guess the issue is that changing over to miles per litre would be worse, and litres per 100 kilometres is the other way round so difficult to get your head around if you're used to miles per gallon.





    lance gross. Lance Gross
  • Lance Gross



  • rajid
    Mar 23, 06:00 PM
    First of all, you can't stop people from sharing information of any type. If not here, then somewhere else; twitter with geotagging, perhaps. Second, as far as I know it's always been illegal to notify other drivers of a cop checking speeds. I would assume it's illegal to notify drivers of a DUI check point as well. If so, arrest the person posting the information, not the program.





    lance gross. Eva-lance-gross
  • Eva-lance-gross



  • A.Fairhead
    Sep 14, 08:21 AM
    Whether the iPhone, if/on release, is in two models (similar to the nano/video relationship) or not, here's a mockup I've just created, depicting what I would expect of the device at the moment.

    I don't usually do mock-ups (this is in fact my first one) but with all the numpad/touchscreen/slide-down ideas in the works, I wanted to show a solution which is based very much on what we have right now. It would make sense that the devices would sit snugly in line with Apple's other mobile products.

    http://www.adamfairhead.co.uk/iphone.jpg





    lance gross. Meagan Good amp; Her Sister
  • Meagan Good amp; Her Sister



  • praetorian909
    Sep 13, 07:34 AM
    Does anyone know how to get into the quick search on the 5G iPods? I updated mine with the 1.2 software but I only see the quick scrolling letter thing.

    It seems like this feature is only available only on the new iPod (as many people previously mentioned). I can't help but wonder if this was purposefully left out, because you'd think it be easily added in a firmware update.

    Oh well, the quick scroll thing is good enough for me...





    lance gross. LANCE GROSS IS MOVING UP
  • LANCE GROSS IS MOVING UP



  • fetchmebeers
    Sep 12, 02:43 PM
    I've waited a year and a half or more for a larger iPod. My mac has almost 70GB of music and I hate manually changing out songs. I never went to the video 5G since the only difference was video with no larger drive... music only for me. If I was to upload album art for all of my imported music 17 thousand plus songs does that take up alot of storage room? Anyone know how much art adds to storage??:p


    no, album arts don't take up that much of a space

    and believe me, you won't be able to put artworks on EVERY SINGLE one of your song file.... you can't, technically.

    and as for the video... well i thought the same way as you did, but now that i got the video one(my old one was photo) it just totally blowed my mind... video thing is just too a great stride for me to deal with
    i'm a music lover myself and that was the only reason that prompted me to buy an ipod but now it seems that peripheral things appease more than anything these dyas





    lance gross. Lance Gross,
  • Lance Gross,



  • firewood
    Mar 23, 04:50 PM
    The way to solve this is to put a sobriety test in the app that has to be passed before the user can view any checkpoints. That way sober drivers won't have to take a route that wastes their valuable time. And sufficiently impaired drunk should be locked out of the app.

    The app's sobriety test "login" can check a person's balance using the accelerometer and gyro, measure their reflex time, and maybe run a short N-back memory and attention span test that should discourage anyone who can't pass these tests from driving in the first place, maybe even display the length of the latest prison sentences doled out to people who drove impaired in their county.





    lance gross. Lance Gross is joining the
  • Lance Gross is joining the



  • h00ligan
    Apr 20, 10:52 AM
    Thanks for actually updating it and replying to me. That's refreshing.

    No prob. Sorry I wasn't more verbose at first. I actually edited it fast (on my iPhone lol) but it took a min.





    lance gross. Eva Marcille amp; Lance Gross
  • Eva Marcille amp; Lance Gross



  • Blakeco123
    Mar 23, 05:49 PM
    Do it apple!!!

    I agree with you. if someone is drunk and is still able to operate the app they could be a hazard if they avoid these points.





    lance gross. “Lance Gross and Eva Marcille
  • “Lance Gross and Eva Marcille



  • Dmac77
    Apr 25, 12:13 AM
    Because that makes it safe.

    A side note: It's under no circumstance appropriate to try to cause a wreck for someone driving slow. That's what causes road rage. Do it to the wrong person and you get killed. I would have just been nice and reported your plates to the police. I wouldn't have likely brake checked, but that's a different point.

    Good luck with reporting my plates. I've done that to drunk drivers before, the 911 operator has told me "We're sorry sir, we cannot divert officers based on heresy." Also, see above: My uncle is the traffic court judge in the jurisdiction where I did this, good luck getting a ticket to stand.

    EDIT: @mrsirs2009 - No I actually just felt like going fast.
    -Don





    lance gross. Lance Gross And Eva Split
  • Lance Gross And Eva Split



  • ouimetnick
    Apr 25, 12:52 PM
    The unibody was already a giant leap forward. How much better can Apple get?

    I'm more interested in the specifications, and hardware (electronics) not so much the casing.





    lance gross. 13 Lance Gross picture.jpg
  • 13 Lance Gross picture.jpg



  • nummy1
    Oct 4, 11:04 PM
    What is the Resolution of these movie files?... and what kind of sound is outputted?... If i spend as much money as I would on a DVD i want the same quality...





    lance gross. Lance Gross Eva Pigford is a
  • Lance Gross Eva Pigford is a



  • jagolden
    Sep 16, 07:01 PM
    :/why is the US so far behind Europe with this kind of technology? :/

    (edit: maybe it isn't i haven't shopped for a phone in nearly a year)
    Because US cell phone carriers suck. :/Because US cell phone carriers suck. :/

    The real reason many foriegn cell phone providers and services are way ahead of the US is an old one:

    The US has had superior LANDLINE service for decades. As foreign countries began to develop worthwhile telephone service (in telephone history, relatively recent), thye opted for more that was not locked in to landlines and the progression of technology gave them a good lead, as opposed to the US which, sure, adopted cell phone use, but the landline service infrastructure that was already in palce held them back-why shell out for new tech when we can plug the old tech and rake in the money. It's funny, the US initial lead actually turned to a disadvantage for them (us).

    Europe is so far ahead of the US in what and how cell phone technolgy is used.





    lance gross. Lance Gross proposed
  • Lance Gross proposed



  • iStudentUK
    Mar 30, 12:33 PM
    While my gut wants to side with MS on this one, there's a simple test of whether App Store is generic or not.

    Before apple created the App Store within iTunes, was the term in use (and specifically "app store", not just "app")? Possibly more importantly, before they applied for the trademark was any company selling apps and calling it by that term?

    It probably comes down to prior art - if it truly is a generic term, then someone should be able to provide the example of X used the term in 19XX, before the trademark was filed. Anyone here able to provide an example of the term being used before Apple filed for it?

    Yay! Somebody who understands the question!

    It's so funny watching people write "well windows/office/word is generic" (although nobody does that with Apple/pages/numbers/keynote). Clueless! :rolleyes:





    lance gross. Lance Gross is DELICIOUS!
  • Lance Gross is DELICIOUS!



  • Vegasman
    Mar 30, 12:43 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Vegasman
    Examples of uses (Dvorak in his references to "killer app"):

    2005: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-k...or-real-estate
    2004: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1599324,00.asp
    2003: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1191830,00.asp

    What I understood is that the word "App" by itself is not the reason for the lawsuit, but the term "App Store" is; both words used together. .

    Correct. I was simply providing additional evidence that "app" was used before the App Store. Something the poster I was replying to was saying and something a lot of other posters are claiming is not true.





    lance gross. lance gross
  • lance gross



  • Skika
    Mar 30, 12:05 PM
    As i recall apple was the first to call applications apllications. Windows uses programs. So why dont they use program store? Or prog store? They never used apps or applications nor they didnt complain before, they just hatin couse they want to profit from the name apple made famous and everyone thinks of apple's app store when the term is being thrown around.

    They want to copy again thats the bottom line, and becouse they cant they want to play childish games.





    lance gross. Lance Gross
  • Lance Gross



  • alec
    Oct 27, 03:31 PM
    Environment? Ha. Move to France.





    lance gross. Lance Gross Picture amp; Photo
  • Lance Gross Picture amp; Photo



  • BenRoethig
    Sep 26, 09:55 AM
    No iPhone for me neither. But really, unless it was out-of-the-park good, there was no change I get one anyway.

    Is anyone else getting a bit tired of all this apple branding outside of the computer space? I mean, a phone? Why o why SJ? :confused:

    Okay, more Apple products out there means more brand recognition. More brand recognition means more people will be willing to check out Apple's hardware offerings. Got it?





    lance gross. Lance Gross and Eva Marcille
  • Lance Gross and Eva Marcille



  • cmaier
    Nov 13, 10:35 PM
    Actually, "this complaint" is about something that is in the developer's guide. The use of Apple icons. There have been lots of apps that have been rejected over it because of the use of icons to similar to other iPhone system icons, or Apple OS icons.

    No, actually it says:

    (d) To the best of Your knowledge and belief, Your Application and Licensed Application Information do not and will not violate, misappropriate, or infringe any Apple or third party copyrights, trademarks, rights of privacy and publicity, trade secrets, patents, or other proprietary or legal rights (e.g. musical composition or performance rights, video rights, photography or image rights, logo rights, third party data rights, etc. for content and materials that may be included in Your Application);

    This is language with legal meaning. There is almost certainly no copyright infringement (fair use, which is a multi-factor test - making money off of the "copying" doesn't eliminate it. Or implied license/exhaustion.)

    It doesn't say "you can't use apple icons." It says "you can't INFRINGE apple copyright."





    awr
    Apr 4, 12:52 PM
    sorry but if i'm a mall security guard and i got 3 thugs poppin off at me - i'm doing headshots all day.

    some of you bleeding hearts want to be all noble - try having any mindset other than "survive" when low-lifes with nothing to lose are pointing guns at you.





    MacNewsFix
    Apr 19, 09:31 AM
    iOS 1 puts Android 2.2 to shame?

    Now you are just talking out of your @ss. In all honesty the difference between iOS and Android is so subtle.

    I've had an iPod Touch since its first release. Zero crashes in four years.

    I've had the HTC Hero since Winter 2009. I have zero additional apps on the device and have to pull the battery out due to a freeze at least once a month. This is my third Hero.





    10layers
    Sep 4, 07:49 PM
    This is exactly what we have been predicting in the article Apple movie downloads soon, what about the TV?. (http://10layers.com/2006/09/apple-movie-downloads-soon-what-about-the-tv/)

    Apple has been driving iPod sales with music sales. We think that they will be driving some new device sales with movie sales. In addition, we do not think that movie downloads will go mainstream until it is convenient to view them on the best device: your home entertainment system. This is what Apple has been redying before launching movie downloads. Apple want the picture to be complete.





    jeff1977
    Mar 29, 02:24 PM
    Just FYI...

    File size wouldn't affect performance at all, as long as you're copying between locations on the same drive. The "file" that you see in the GUI is actually a link to a location on disk where your data is; all the OS has to move is the link, which is very tiny.

    Thanks for clarifying that for me! I don't like doing things that I'm not sure about. As I said, my being unsure stemmed from windows that would sometimes come up in older versions of Photoshop, when closing, that mentioned clipboard sizes being too large. Or something along those lines. Again, thanks.





    Multimedia
    Sep 10, 09:33 PM
    Flame me if you must, but what is the sense in having multiple cores if the software running on it doesn't take advantage of it? Same thing with advertising the new chips as being 64 bit. That's great, but I don't have anything (not in beta) that can use it.

    Apple themselves have never been great at making use of multiple processors (in tandem), so I'm not getting how 4, 8, 32 cores makes much difference?How many times do I need to remind some of you that it doesn't matter if applications can only use one or two cores? You can run a bunch of things at once with all these cores at your disposal. That to me is what's important, as I think so should you think - not that one application can't use more than one or two cores. If anything, it's a good thing some only use one or two cores.

    You can run a bunch of things at once - Simultaneously - with all these cores at your disposal. That's what's important - not that one application can't use more than one or two cores. On the contrary. If I had 8 cores I wouldn't have to quit Mail all the time.

    Do you realize that Mail uses 100% of a core ALL THE TIME? If I leave it open I only have 3 cores to work with. I mean it's rediculous. I have to QUIT Mail to do my work. Absurd.

    We Need More Cores And We Need Them NOW!According to the Page 2 Rumors there are some significant speed ups to OpenGL in the next update to 10.4 due to multithreading. Apple has had 4 processor systems for over a year now. I would think they have some ideas about how to make use of it.

    Things like the next version of iChat... 1 core to run some application, another for the computer to compress that image into a nice stream to be broadcast over the net, and another to do the actual operation of iChat and the OS and whatever else you have in the background at the time.

    There are all sorts of stupid (and not so stupid) ways to eat up processor cycles if you have them. :rolleyes:You took the words right out of my fingers. Bravo sisyphus.